tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7290421183272663684.post5270800427213028423..comments2022-11-24T09:37:31.718+00:00Comments on STEVEN J DINES: Movie Review: Stephen King's The MistSteven J. Dineshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10598117803833426352noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7290421183272663684.post-21451722252630852412009-01-17T13:43:00.000+00:002009-01-17T13:43:00.000+00:00I know what you mean, Ian. Light and shade seem m...I know what you mean, Ian. Light and shade seem more pronounced (and therefore more effective) in black and white. Then there is the whole feel to it, unreal and yet at the same time old-fashioned. I'm currently watching the first season of Alfred Hitchcock Presents and it just seems right in black & white. Same goes for The Twilight Zone. The colour Eighties version doesn't compare to the original, and not just because the stories are inferior - it's simply not the same in colour. <BR/><BR/>Thanks for visiting, Ian.<BR/><BR/>Best,<BR/>StevenSteven J. Dineshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10598117803833426352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7290421183272663684.post-1861970103450933132009-01-17T13:07:00.000+00:002009-01-17T13:07:00.000+00:00What is it about black & white (which I grew u...What is it about black & white (which I grew up with)? I just watched <I>Blood On The Moon</I>, an old Robert Mitchum western, and it looked great, even on a tatty print. I think it's soemthing to do with texture... or tired eyes maybe. Good crit Steven. You should start a dedicated film blog.Tuonelahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03204662879792041735noreply@blogger.com